Okay So if you've known me for a long while you might already know what I had to say about Star Wars II: Attack of the Clones. I wasn't actually Going to see Episode III because of all the Obi-Wannabees clogging the theater lines this week, but I was bored and just happened to have $7.50.

So how was Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith? Well....Better. The whole story between Anakin Vadar and Natalie Amidala could have been improved upon. The acting was fine, it just started to feel stale after a few minuites because their whole storyline was carried out on only two sets. I guess I love the original Star Wars movies because there is a lot of "Go there, shoot that, That's No Moon, Blah blah blah".
I will say that if it was EVEN possible Hayden Christensen got even FINER. And the Hair was WAY better in this movie. I'm willing to look at Ewan McGregor's pretty bearded face as long as he is Sans Mullett.
And I did like the props Lucas gave out to Frankenstein and Dracula. I also like some of the subtle George Bush slamming they included. Although the ending pissed me off a little where they show Leia being given to her adoptive parents the Lord and Lady or whoever of Alderan, because you KNOW the damn place is gonna get blown to smithereens in 18 years by the Death Star. But I'm stopping right now because it's bringing me into a seriously Clerks-like train of thought.

Old * New * Guestbook * Profile * E-mail * Banned * Wishlist * Diaryland